national parks: be important in united states

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in united states 1.00
be called united states 0.97
is united 0.89
be important in states 0.88
be member of united nations 0.86
be called states 0.82
be in 3 states 0.77
be important in cities 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in united states)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in united states)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(united states, be called united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in united states)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(united states, be member of united nations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in united states)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(united states, is united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in united states)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(united states, be called united states)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(united states, is united)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(park, be important in united states)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(united states, be member of united nations)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(park, be important in cities)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, be important in united states)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(united states, be called united states)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(united states, is united)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(united states, be member of united nations)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be in 3 states)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in united states)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(united states, be called united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in united states)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(united states, is united) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in united states)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(united states, be member of united nations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in united states)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in united states)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(yellowstone, be in 3 states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, be in 3 states)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(national parks, be important in united states)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(national parks, be important in states)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in states)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in states)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in united states)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(united states, be called united states)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(united states, is united)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(united states, be member of united nations)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, be important in united states)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(park, be important in cities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be in 3 states)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(united states, be called united states)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(united states, is united)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(united states, be member of united nations)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, be important in united states)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(national parks, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(park, be important in cities)