national parks: be important in states

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents park
Weight: 0.70
, campground
Weight: 0.64
, wilderness
Weight: 0.64
, united states
Weight: 0.63
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.83
, lake powell
Weight: 0.70
, yellowstone
Weight: 0.57
, national park
Weight: 0.40
, central park
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in states 1.00
be called states 0.92
be important in united states 0.88
be in 3 states 0.86
be called united states 0.82
be important in cities 0.81
be important in towns 0.78
have necessary in big cities system 0.78
be important to people 0.78
have necessary in cities system 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in states)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in states)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in states)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(park, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in states)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be important in towns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in states)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(united states, be called united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in states)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(united states, be called united states)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(park, be important in united states)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(park, be important in cities)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(park, be important in towns)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(park, be important to people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(park, be important in towns)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, be important in united states)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(united states, be called united states)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone, be in 3 states)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(park, be important in united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in states)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(park, be important in cities) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in states)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in states)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(park, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in states)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(park, be important in towns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in states)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(united states, be called united states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in states)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(yellowstone, be in 3 states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(yellowstone, be in 3 states)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(central park, be important to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(national parks, be important in states)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(national parks, be important in united states)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in united states)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(national parks, be important in united states)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in united states)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(national parks, be important in states)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(united states, be called united states)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(park, be important in cities)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(park, be important in towns)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be important to people)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, be important in united states)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(yellowstone, be in 3 states)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(united states, be called united states)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, be important in united states)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(park, be important in cities)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(park, be important in towns)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be important to people)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(national parks, be important in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)