park: have necessary in big cities system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
have necessary in big cities system 1.00
be important in cities 0.90
be important in system 0.82
help growth of cities 0.82
be important in towns 0.82
be important to people of new city 0.80
be important in economic system 0.80
be important to people of city 0.79
be in city help 0.79
be important in american economic system 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(property, be important in american economic system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(location, help growth of cities)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(location, help growth of cities)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(property, be important in american economic system)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(location, help growth of cities)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(property, be important in american economic system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(property, be important in american economic system)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(location, help growth of cities)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new city)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of new city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(park, have necessary in big cities system)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(park, be important in cities)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(park, be important in cities)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(park, be important in cities)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(park, be important in towns)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(park, be in city help)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(park, be in city help)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(park, be important in towns)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(park, be in city help)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(park, be important in towns)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(park, be important in towns)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(location, help growth of cities)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(property, be important in american economic system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of new city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(location, help growth of cities)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(property, be important in american economic system)