park: be in city help

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in city help 1.00
be important to people of city 0.87
be important to people of new city 0.86
help community 0.82
cool city 0.81
have necessary in big cities system 0.79
help growth of cities 0.78
help communities 0.78
be important in cities 0.78
be important to people of new york city 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(location, help growth of cities)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(park, be in city help)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(location, help growth of cities)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(location, help growth of cities)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new york city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(location, help growth of cities)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(park, be in city help)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new city)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of new city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of new york city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of new york city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(park, be in city help)

Similarity expansion

0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(park, cool city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(park, have necessary in big cities system)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(park, cool city)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(park, be important in cities)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(park, be important in cities)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(park, help communities)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(park, have necessary in big cities system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(park, cool city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, be important to people of new york city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people of new york city)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(park, cool city)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(park, help communities)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(park, be important in cities)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(park, be important in cities)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(park, help communities)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, have necessary in big cities system)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(park, be important to people of new york city)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(park, have necessary in big cities system)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(park, help communities)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(park, be important to people of new york city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(park, be in city help)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(location, help growth of cities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of new city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of new york city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(park, be in city help)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(location, help growth of cities)