native american: were treated poorly

Related concepts

Parents	south america Weight: 0.76 , american Weight: 0.70 , america Weight: 0.69 , native Weight: 0.52
Siblings	george washington Weight: 0.70 , apache Weight: 0.62 , cherokee Weight: 0.61 , spanish Weight: 0.61 , eskimo Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were treated poorly	1.00
were were treated	0.86
were treated	0.86
were treated fairly	0.85
were treated differently in north	0.84
were treated under encomienda system	0.84
were people treated	0.83
were treated in war	0.82
were treated after war	0.82
be treated	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(american, were treated after war) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(native american, were treated poorly)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(american, be treated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(native american, were treated poorly)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(american, were treated after war)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(american, be treated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(american, were treated after war)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(american, be treated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(american, were treated after war) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(native american, were treated poorly)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(american, be treated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(native american, were treated poorly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(native american, were treated poorly)

Similarity expansion

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated under encomienda system)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(native american, were treated)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated after war)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(native american, were treated fairly)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(native american, were treated under encomienda system)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(native american, were treated)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(native american, were treated after war)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(native american, were treated under encomienda system)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(native american, were treated under encomienda system)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(native american, were treated)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(native american, were treated fairly)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated fairly)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(native american, were treated fairly)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(native american, were treated after war)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(native american, were treated after war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(native american, were treated poorly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(american, were treated after war)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(american, be treated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(american, were treated after war)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.36

Typical(native american, were treated poorly) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(american, be treated)