negligence: be by state

Related concepts

Parents	charge Weight: 0.65 , tort Weight: 0.63 , cause Weight: 0.63 , failure Weight: 0.61
Siblings	manslaughter Weight: 0.34 , child neglect Weight: 0.34 , heart failure Weight: 0.33 , ignorance Weight: 0.33 , respiratory failure Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be by state	1.00
has state states	0.81
has state rule	0.78
has state problem	0.76
be necalli	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(child neglect, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(child neglect, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(child neglect, has state problem)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(negligence, be by state)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has state states)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(negligence, has state states)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(negligence, has state states)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(negligence, has state rule)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(negligence, has state rule)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(negligence, has state rule)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(negligence, has state states)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(negligence, has state rule)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(negligence, be by state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(negligence, be by state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(child neglect, has state problem)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(negligence, be by state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(ignorance, has state problem)