negligence: has state states

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents charge
Weight: 0.65
, tort
Weight: 0.63
, cause
Weight: 0.63
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings manslaughter
Weight: 0.34
, child neglect
Weight: 0.34
, heart failure
Weight: 0.33
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, respiratory failure
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state states 1.00
be by state 0.81
has state problem 0.77
has state rule 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(child neglect, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(child neglect, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(child neglect, has state problem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(negligence, has state states)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(negligence, be by state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(negligence, be by state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(negligence, be by state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has state rule)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(negligence, has state rule)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(negligence, has state rule)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(negligence, be by state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(negligence, has state rule)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has state states)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(negligence, has state states)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(child neglect, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has state states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ignorance, has state problem)