ignorance: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bliss
Weight: 0.64
, cause
Weight: 0.62
, obstacle
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.59
Siblings laziness
Weight: 0.35
, fear
Weight: 0.33
, negligence
Weight: 0.33
, bias
Weight: 0.33
, illiteracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be cause problem 0.86
is social problem 0.85
be problem in source 0.85
be cause social problem 0.83
be problem learning 0.80
be problem in america 0.79
be problem learning about history 0.79
be problem in historical source 0.78
is issue 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in america)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem learning about history)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in historical source)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem learning)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, is issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(negligence, is issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(bias, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bias, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bias, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(laziness, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(laziness, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illiteracy, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bias, be problem in source)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem in source)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(bias, is issue)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bias, is issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(negligence, is issue)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(negligence, is issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(illiteracy, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be problem in america)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(illiteracy, is issue)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, is issue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(bias, be problem learning)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem learning)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(bias, be problem learning about history)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem learning about history)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(bias, be problem in historical source)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem in historical source)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(ignorance, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ignorance, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bias, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is social problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(bias, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(laziness, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(illiteracy, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(negligence, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in source)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be problem in america)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be cause social problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bias, be problem learning)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bias, be problem learning about history)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in historical source)