bias: be problem in source

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, voltage
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, influence
Weight: 0.58
Siblings prejudice
Weight: 0.60
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, distortion
Weight: 0.33
, hostility
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in source 1.00
be problem in historical source 0.88
has state problem 0.85
is social problem 0.80
be problem for society 0.80
be related to power supplied by source 0.80
be different from problems 0.79
be related to power supplied by source in parallel 0.78
is economic problem 0.78
be problem learning 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(voltage, be related to power supplied by source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in source)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(voltage, be related to power supplied by source in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in source)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(voltage, be related to power supplied by source in parallel)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(voltage, be related to power supplied by source)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be related to power supplied by source in parallel)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(voltage, be related to power supplied by source)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(distortion, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(inequality, is social problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(voltage, be related to power supplied by source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem in source)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(voltage, be related to power supplied by source in parallel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem in source)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(prejudice, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(prejudice, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(inequality, is social problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(inequality, is social problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(inequality, is economic problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(inequality, is economic problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(inequality, be problem for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(inequality, be problem for society)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(distortion, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(distortion, has state problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(ignorance, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(bias, be problem in source)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in historical source)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(bias, has state problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bias, has state problem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bias, has state problem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(bias, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem learning)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(bias, be problem in historical source)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(bias, be problem learning)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem learning)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bias, be problem in historical source)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bias, be problem learning)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in historical source)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(bias, be problem in source)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(voltage, be related to power supplied by source)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(voltage, be related to power supplied by source in parallel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prejudice, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(inequality, is social problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, is economic problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(inequality, be problem for society)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(distortion, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ignorance, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(voltage, be related to power supplied by source)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(bias, be problem in source) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(voltage, be related to power supplied by source in parallel)