nerd: be vs dork

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.55
, insult
Weight: 0.54
, word
Weight: 0.52
, man
Weight: 0.51
Siblings fart
Weight: 0.33
, asshole
Weight: 0.33
, jock
Weight: 0.33
, chick
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs dork 1.00
be vs geek 0.90
be vs geek lyrics 0.89
have nerd voices 0.79
look like nerds 0.79
is nerds 0.78
is nerds nerds 0.78
be called nerds 0.78
called nerds 0.78
is stereotypical nerds 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(jock, is nerds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(jock, is nerds)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(jock, is nerds)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(jock, is stereotypical nerds)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(jock, is stereotypical nerds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(nerd, be vs dork)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(nerd, be vs geek lyrics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(nerd, look like nerds)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(nerd, is nerds)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(nerd, have nerd voices)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nerd, be vs geek)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(nerd, be vs geek)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(nerd, called nerds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nerd, is nerds nerds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(nerd, look like nerds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(nerd, be called nerds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(nerd, have nerd voices)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nerd, is nerds nerds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(nerd, called nerds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(nerd, look like nerds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(nerd, is nerds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(nerd, be vs geek lyrics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(nerd, be vs geek)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(nerd, look like nerds)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(nerd, be vs geek lyrics)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(nerd, be called nerds)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(nerd, called nerds)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(nerd, is nerds)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(nerd, have nerd voices)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(nerd, be called nerds)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(nerd, is nerds nerds)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nerd, be vs geek lyrics)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nerd, is nerds)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(nerd, be vs geek)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(nerd, have nerd voices)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(nerd, called nerds)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(nerd, is nerds nerds)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(nerd, be called nerds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(nerd, be vs dork)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(jock, is nerds)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(nerd, be vs dork)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(jock, is stereotypical nerds)