net: be worth calculated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web
Weight: 0.62
, loss
Weight: 0.58
, equipment
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, website
Weight: 0.55
Siblings seine
Weight: 0.43
, world wide web
Weight: 0.33
, glove
Weight: 0.32
, overhead
Weight: 0.31
, power line
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worth calculated 1.00
be calculated 0.91
has quality worth 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(loss, be calculated)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(net, be worth calculated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(net, be worth calculated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(web, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(net, be worth calculated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(loss, be calculated)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(web, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loss, be calculated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(loss, be calculated)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(net, be worth calculated)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(net, be worth calculated)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(web, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(net, be worth calculated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(net, be worth calculated)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(net, be calculated)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(net, be calculated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(net, be calculated)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(net, be calculated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(net, has quality worth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(net, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(net, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(net, be worth calculated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(loss, be calculated)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(loss, be calculated)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(net, be worth calculated)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)