net: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web
Weight: 0.62
, loss
Weight: 0.58
, equipment
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, website
Weight: 0.55
Siblings seine
Weight: 0.43
, world wide web
Weight: 0.33
, glove
Weight: 0.32
, overhead
Weight: 0.31
, power line
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality cost 0.85
has quality bad 0.82
is value 0.79
is value best 0.79
be worth calculated 0.79
is present value best 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(net, has quality worth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(web, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(net, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(net, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(loss, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(net, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(web, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(loss, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(power line, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(net, has quality worth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(web, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(net, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(net, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(loss, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(net, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(power line, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(power line, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(net, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality cost)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(net, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(net, is value best)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(net, be worth calculated)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(net, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(loss, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power line, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(loss, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)