web: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web site
Weight: 0.85
, world wide web
Weight: 0.73
, web browser
Weight: 0.72
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, information
Weight: 0.62
Siblings net
Weight: 0.62
, portal
Weight: 0.60
, mashup
Weight: 0.53
, web page
Weight: 0.42
, website
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worth 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(portal, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(net, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(net, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(portal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(portal, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(net, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(net, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(web, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(web, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(web, has quality worth)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(net, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(net, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(portal, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)