net: is value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web
Weight: 0.62
, loss
Weight: 0.58
, equipment
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, website
Weight: 0.55
Siblings seine
Weight: 0.43
, world wide web
Weight: 0.33
, glove
Weight: 0.32
, overhead
Weight: 0.31
, power line
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is value 1.00
is value best 0.92
is present value 0.91
is present value best 0.87
has quality worth 0.79
has quality cost 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(net, is value)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(web, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(net, is value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(web, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(net, is value)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(web, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(net, is value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(net, is value)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(net, is value best)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(net, is present value)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(net, is present value best)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(net, is present value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality cost)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(net, is value best)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(net, is present value)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(net, has quality worth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(net, is present value)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(net, is present value best)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(net, has quality worth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(net, has quality cost)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(net, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(net, has quality cost)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(net, has quality cost)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(net, is value best)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(net, is present value best)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(net, is value best)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(net, is present value best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(net, is value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(net, is value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(net, is value)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)