net: is value best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web
Weight: 0.62
, loss
Weight: 0.58
, equipment
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, website
Weight: 0.55
Siblings seine
Weight: 0.43
, world wide web
Weight: 0.33
, glove
Weight: 0.32
, overhead
Weight: 0.31
, power line
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is value best 1.00
is present value best 0.94
is value 0.92
is present value 0.87
has quality worth 0.79
has quality cost 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(net, is value best)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(web, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(net, is value best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(web, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(net, is value best)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(web, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(net, is value best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(net, is value best)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(net, is value)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(net, is value)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(net, is present value best)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(net, is value)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(net, is present value)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(net, is value best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(net, is value best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(net, is value best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)