net: is present value best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web
Weight: 0.62
, loss
Weight: 0.58
, equipment
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
, website
Weight: 0.55
Siblings seine
Weight: 0.43
, world wide web
Weight: 0.33
, glove
Weight: 0.32
, overhead
Weight: 0.31
, power line
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is present value best 1.00
is present value 0.95
is value best 0.94
is value 0.87
has quality worth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(net, is present value best)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(web, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(net, is present value best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(web, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(net, is present value best)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(web, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(net, is present value best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(net, is present value best)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(net, is present value)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(net, is present value)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(net, is value best)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(net, is present value)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(net, is value)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(net, is value)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(net, is value)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(net, is value best)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(net, is value best)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(net, is value best)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(net, is present value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(net, has quality worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(net, has quality worth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(net, is value)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(net, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(net, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(net, is present value best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(net, is present value best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(web, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(net, is present value best)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)