nickelodeon: has quality evil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents channel
Weight: 0.62
, brand
Weight: 0.61
, network
Weight: 0.60
, company
Weight: 0.59
, tv show
Weight: 0.56
Siblings spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.64
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.33
, soap opera
Weight: 0.33
, simpsons
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality evil 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
be awful god 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(nickelodeon, has quality evil)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(nickelodeon, be awful god)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, be awful god)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(nickelodeon, be awful god)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(nickelodeon, be awful god)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(nickelodeon, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nickelodeon, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nickelodeon, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality bad)