nightgown: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	garment Weight: 0.52 , lingerie Weight: 0.43 , gift Weight: 0.43 , clothing Weight: 0.39 , bed Weight: 0.35
Siblings	blouse Weight: 0.33 , gown Weight: 0.33 , skirt Weight: 0.33 , dress Weight: 0.33 , robe Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality better	0.94
is ungiven good	0.87
feel good	0.80
be bad for environment	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(nightgown, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(nightgown, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(bed, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(nightgown, has quality good)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(clothing, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(nightgown, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(bed, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(clothing, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(bed, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(clothing, be bad for environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(skirt, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(skirt, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(nightgown, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(bed, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(nightgown, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(nightgown, has quality good)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(clothing, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(nightgown, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(skirt, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(skirt, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(skirt, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(skirt, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(nightgown, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(nightgown, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(clothing, be bad for environment)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(bed, has quality bad)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(skirt, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(skirt, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(bed, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(nightgown, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(clothing, be bad for environment)