nike: be under attack

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.62
, shoe
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.61
, client
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chanel
Weight: 0.34
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, hermes
Weight: 0.34
, oxford
Weight: 0.34
, burberry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under attack 1.00
be under fire 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(nike, be under attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be under fire)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nike, be under attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(pepsi, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be under fire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nike, be under attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(nike, be under attack)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(nike, be under attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(nike, be under fire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(nike, be under attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nike, be under fire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nike, be under attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(nike, be under fire)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(nike, be under attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(nike, be under fire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(nike, be under attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(nike, be under attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(nike, be under attack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(nike, be under attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(nike, be under attack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(nike, be under attack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pepsi, be under fire)