nike: be under fire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.62
, shoe
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.61
, client
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chanel
Weight: 0.34
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, hermes
Weight: 0.34
, oxford
Weight: 0.34
, burberry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be under fire 1.00
be on fire 0.93
is are set on fire 0.85
be under attack 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be under fire)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(pepsi, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be under fire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(nike, be under fire)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(nike, be on fire)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(nike, be on fire)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nike, be on fire)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nike, is are set on fire)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(nike, is are set on fire)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(nike, is are set on fire)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nike, is are set on fire)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nike, be on fire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(nike, be under attack)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(nike, be under attack)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(nike, be under attack)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(nike, be under attack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(nike, be under fire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nike, be under fire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(nike, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pepsi, be under fire)