nike: is are set on fire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.62
, shoe
Weight: 0.62
, product
Weight: 0.61
, client
Weight: 0.55
, name
Weight: 0.54
Siblings chanel
Weight: 0.34
, pepsi
Weight: 0.34
, hermes
Weight: 0.34
, oxford
Weight: 0.34
, burberry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is are set on fire 1.00
be on fire 0.90
be under fire 0.85
is are burned 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be under fire)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(pepsi, be under fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be under fire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(nike, is are set on fire)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(nike, be on fire)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(nike, be on fire)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(nike, be on fire)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(nike, is are burned)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(nike, is are burned)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(nike, be under fire)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(nike, be under fire)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(nike, be under fire)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(nike, is are burned)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nike, be on fire)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(nike, be under fire)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(nike, is are burned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(nike, is are set on fire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(nike, is are set on fire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(nike, is are set on fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pepsi, be under fire)