nuclear power plant: have cooling towers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.85
, power plant
Weight: 0.72
, facility
Weight: 0.71
, power
Weight: 0.71
, chemical
Weight: 0.68
Siblings chemical plant
Weight: 0.40
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.40
, water plant
Weight: 0.38
, hydro
Weight: 0.37
, nuclear fission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have cooling towers 1.00
cooling towers 1.00
have towers 0.89
need cooling 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(power plant, cooling towers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(power plant, have cooling towers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(power plant, need cooling)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(power plant, have cooling towers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(power plant, cooling towers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, need cooling)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(power plant, cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, need cooling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, need cooling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, have towers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, have towers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, have towers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(nuclear power plant, need cooling)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, need cooling)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, need cooling)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, need cooling)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have towers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, cooling towers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(power plant, have cooling towers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power plant, need cooling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, need cooling)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, cooling towers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(power plant, have cooling towers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power plant, need cooling)