power plant: need cooling

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.77
, plant
Weight: 0.73
, utility
Weight: 0.68
Siblings natural gas
Weight: 0.70
, nuclear reactor
Weight: 0.69
, hydro
Weight: 0.68
, power
Weight: 0.67
, turbine
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
need cooling 1.00
use cooling 0.97
have cooling towers 0.85
cooling towers 0.85
need water 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(nuclear power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power plant, need cooling)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(plant, need water)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power plant, need cooling)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power plant, need cooling)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power plant, need cooling)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nuclear power plant, need water)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power plant, need cooling)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, need cooling)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, need water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(plant, need water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, need cooling)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, need water)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(plant, need water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, need cooling)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(nuclear power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(plant, need water)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(nuclear power plant, need water)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(power plant, need cooling)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, need cooling)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(power plant, need cooling)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(power plant, cooling towers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(power plant, cooling towers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(power plant, need water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(power plant, cooling towers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(power plant, need water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(power plant, have cooling towers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(power plant, need water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(power plant, have cooling towers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(power plant, have cooling towers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(power plant, have cooling towers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(power plant, cooling towers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power plant, need cooling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, need water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, need cooling)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, need water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, need cooling)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(nuclear reactor, cooling towers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, need cooling)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, cooling towers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, need water)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, have cooling towers)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(power plant, need cooling)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(plant, need water)