nuclear weapon: were even considered built

Related concepts

Parents	chemical weapon Weight: 0.80 , nuclear power plant Weight: 0.75 , weapon Weight: 0.73 , missile Weight: 0.73 , ballistic missile Weight: 0.67
Siblings	atomic bomb Weight: 0.79 , neutron bomb Weight: 0.72 , hydrogen bomb Weight: 0.72 , cruise missile Weight: 0.71 , trident Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were even considered built	1.00
were built	0.92
is are built	0.90
being are built	0.89
be built	0.86
is built	0.86
were built near water	0.84
is are developed	0.81
be constructed	0.80
be built near water	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(nuclear power plant, is are built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(nuclear power plant, is built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(nuclear power plant, being are built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(nuclear power plant, were built near water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(weapon, is are developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(weapon, were even considered built)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, were built near water)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near water)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(weapon, is are developed)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, being are built)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, is are built)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, is built)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(weapon, were even considered built)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be built)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is are built)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, being are built)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, is built)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(weapon, is are developed)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, were built near water)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be built near water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, were built)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(atomic bomb, be constructed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(nuclear power plant, is are built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(nuclear power plant, being are built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(nuclear power plant, is built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(nuclear power plant, were built near water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(weapon, is are developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(nuclear power plant, be built near water) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(atomic bomb, were built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, were built)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(atomic bomb, be constructed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(atomic bomb, be constructed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Salient(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(weapon, were even considered built)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, were built near water)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, being are built)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built near water)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is are built)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is built)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(weapon, is are developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(atomic bomb, were built)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(atomic bomb, be constructed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(weapon, were even considered built)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, were built near water)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built near water)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, being are built)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be built)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(weapon, is are developed)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is are built)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(nuclear weapon, were even considered built) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, is built)