nuke: be considered competitive map

Property	Similarity
be considered competitive map	1.00
be in competitive map pool	0.91
be considered map	0.89
be in map pool	0.81
be in faceit map pool	0.81

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(nuke, be considered map)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(nuke, be considered map)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(nuke, be considered map)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(nuke, be in competitive map pool)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(nuke, be in competitive map pool)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(nuke, be considered map)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(nuke, be in map pool)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(nuke, be in competitive map pool)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(nuke, be in map pool)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(nuke, be in map pool)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(nuke, be in faceit map pool)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.07

Remarkable(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(nuke, be in faceit map pool)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(nuke, be in faceit map pool)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(nuke, be in map pool)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(nuke, be in competitive map pool)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.27

Typical(nuke, be considered competitive map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(nuke, be in faceit map pool)

Parents	weapon Weight: 0.64 , thing Weight: 0.55 , bomb Weight: 0.51 , application Weight: 0.49 , war Weight: 0.48
Siblings	nuclear weapon Weight: 0.37 , atomic bomb Weight: 0.36 , chemical weapon Weight: 0.35 , missile Weight: 0.34

nuke: be considered competitive map

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible