nuke: be in competitive map pool

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, bomb
Weight: 0.51
, application
Weight: 0.49
, war
Weight: 0.48
Siblings nuclear weapon
Weight: 0.37
, atomic bomb
Weight: 0.36
, chemical weapon
Weight: 0.35
, missile
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in competitive map pool 1.00
be in map pool 0.93
be in faceit map pool 0.93
be considered competitive map 0.91
be considered map 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(nuke, be in competitive map pool)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(nuke, be considered competitive map)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(nuke, be considered competitive map)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(nuke, be in map pool)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(nuke, be in map pool)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(nuke, be in map pool)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nuke, be considered competitive map)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(nuke, be in faceit map pool)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(nuke, be in faceit map pool)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(nuke, be in faceit map pool)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(nuke, be in map pool)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(nuke, be considered map)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(nuke, be considered map)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(nuke, be in faceit map pool)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(nuke, be considered map)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(nuke, be considered map)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(nuke, be considered competitive map)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(nuke, be in competitive map pool)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nuke, be in competitive map pool)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(nuke, be in competitive map pool)