nuke: be considered map

Property	Similarity
be considered map	1.00
be considered competitive map	0.89
be in map pool	0.86
be in faceit map pool	0.86
be in competitive map pool	0.80

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(nuke, be considered competitive map)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(nuke, be considered competitive map)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(nuke, be in map pool)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(nuke, be in map pool)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(nuke, be in map pool)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(nuke, be in faceit map pool)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(nuke, be in faceit map pool)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.21

Typical(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(nuke, be considered competitive map)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(nuke, be in competitive map pool)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(nuke, be in faceit map pool)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.08

Salient(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(nuke, be in competitive map pool)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.21

Typical(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(nuke, be in map pool)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(nuke, be in competitive map pool)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(nuke, be considered competitive map)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.21

Typical(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(nuke, be in faceit map pool)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.21

Typical(nuke, be considered map) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(nuke, be in competitive map pool)

Parents	weapon Weight: 0.64 , thing Weight: 0.55 , bomb Weight: 0.51 , application Weight: 0.49 , war Weight: 0.48
Siblings	nuclear weapon Weight: 0.37 , atomic bomb Weight: 0.36 , chemical weapon Weight: 0.35 , missile Weight: 0.34

nuke: be considered map

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible