oak: be good for furniture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.74
, hardwood
Weight: 0.68
, wood
Weight: 0.67
, tree
Weight: 0.64
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.42
, maple tree
Weight: 0.39
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, beech
Weight: 0.39
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for furniture 1.00
be used for furniture 0.96
be good material for furniture 0.95
be good for flooring 0.84
be used for flooring 0.81
is good wood 0.80
be good wood use 0.79
be suitable for flooring 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardwood, be used for furniture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wood, be used for furniture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(oak, be good for furniture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(wood, be good for furniture)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(wood, be used for furniture)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be used for furniture)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wood, be good for furniture)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used for furniture)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be used for furniture)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(beech, be used for furniture)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(beech, is good wood)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(wood, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(hardwood, be used for furniture)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(wood, be used for furniture)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(beech, be used for furniture)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(beech, be used for furniture)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(beech, is good wood)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(beech, is good wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(oak, be good for furniture)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(oak, be used for furniture)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(oak, be good material for furniture)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(oak, be used for furniture)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(oak, be good material for furniture)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(oak, be used for furniture)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(oak, be good material for furniture)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(oak, be good for flooring)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(oak, is good wood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(oak, be good for flooring)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(oak, be used for flooring)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(oak, be good wood use)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(oak, is good wood)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(oak, is good wood)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(oak, be good for flooring)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(oak, be suitable for flooring)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oak, be used for flooring)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(oak, be good wood use)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(oak, is good wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oak, be used for furniture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good material for furniture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(oak, be good wood use)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(oak, be used for flooring)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(oak, be suitable for flooring)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(oak, be suitable for flooring)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good wood use)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for flooring)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(oak, be used for flooring)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(oak, be suitable for flooring)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(oak, be good for furniture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hardwood, be used for furniture)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(wood, be used for furniture)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(wood, be good for furniture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beech, be used for furniture)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(beech, is good wood)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(wood, be good for furniture)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hardwood, be used for furniture)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(oak, be good for furniture)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(wood, be used for furniture)