oatmeal: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.71
, food
Weight: 0.65
, cereal
Weight: 0.65
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.64
Siblings cinnamon
Weight: 0.37
, caramel
Weight: 0.36
, lemon juice
Weight: 0.36
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, sweet potato
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality bad 0.90
be better than bread 0.76
be better than instant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(oatmeal, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(oatmeal, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(oatmeal, has quality better)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(oatmeal, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sweet potato, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(oatmeal, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(oatmeal, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(oatmeal, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(oatmeal, has quality bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(oatmeal, be better than bread)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oatmeal, be better than instant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(oatmeal, be better than bread)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(oatmeal, be better than bread)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(oatmeal, be better than instant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(oatmeal, be better than instant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, be better than instant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, be better than bread)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(oatmeal, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweet potato, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(oatmeal, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)