cinnamon: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.74
, herb
Weight: 0.68
, ingredient
Weight: 0.67
, color
Weight: 0.65
, taste
Weight: 0.65
Siblings peppermint
Weight: 0.39
, cumin
Weight: 0.39
, caramel
Weight: 0.39
, garlic
Weight: 0.38
, thyme
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be good for pcos 0.81
has quality question 0.76
be good for us 0.75
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(color, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(taste, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(color, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(color, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(caramel, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(color, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(taste, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(taste, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(garlic, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(garlic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(caramel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(caramel, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cinnamon, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cinnamon, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cinnamon, be good for pcos)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, be good for pcos)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cinnamon, be good for us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, be good for pcos)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cinnamon, be good for pcos)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, be good for us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cinnamon, be good for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cinnamon, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cinnamon, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(color, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(taste, has quality question)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(taste, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(caramel, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(color, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(taste, has quality questions)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cinnamon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(taste, has quality question)