taste: has quality question

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality question 1.00
has quality questions 0.92
has quality good 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(taste, has quality question)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(taste, has quality question)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(taste, has quality question)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(quality, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(smell, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(texture, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(passion, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality question)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality question)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(quality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality question)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(passion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(passion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(passion, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(texture, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(texture, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(smell, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(smell, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(texture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(texture, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(taste, has quality question)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(taste, has quality questions)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality questions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(taste, has quality questions)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality questions)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(taste, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(taste, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(taste, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(taste, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(passion, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(passion, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(texture, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(smell, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(texture, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(quality, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(quality, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(taste, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)