observation: be better than subjective observations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.65
, instrument
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.61
Siblings experiment
Weight: 0.65
, outlier
Weight: 0.53
, hipparchus
Weight: 0.33
, evaluation
Weight: 0.33
, telescope
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than subjective observations 1.00
be different from subjective observations 0.98
be better than observations 0.91
be different from observations 0.89
be better than correlational studies 0.80
differ from inferences 0.78
be good method of assessment 0.76
lead to scientific inferences 0.76
relate to scientific method 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(experiment, be better than correlational studies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(experiment, be better than correlational studies)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(experiment, be better than correlational studies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(observation, be better than subjective observations)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(observation, be different from subjective observations)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(observation, be different from subjective observations)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(observation, be different from subjective observations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(observation, differ from inferences)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(observation, differ from inferences)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(observation, be different from subjective observations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(observation, lead to scientific inferences)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(observation, be good method of assessment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(observation, relate to scientific method)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(observation, differ from inferences)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(observation, lead to scientific inferences)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(observation, be good method of assessment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(observation, relate to scientific method)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(observation, lead to scientific inferences)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(observation, be good method of assessment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(observation, differ from inferences)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(observation, relate to scientific method)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(observation, lead to scientific inferences)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(observation, relate to scientific method)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(observation, be good method of assessment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, be better than subjective observations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(observation, be better than subjective observations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(observation, be better than subjective observations)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(experiment, be better than correlational studies)