oil: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents natural gas
Weight: 0.67
, vegetable oil
Weight: 0.65
, fuel
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.61
, raw material
Weight: 0.59
Siblings castor oil
Weight: 0.83
, motor oil
Weight: 0.80
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.70
, castor
Weight: 0.41
, olive oil
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is good choice 0.78
is good thing 0.78
be bad for environment 0.77
affect air quality 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(oil, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(oil, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(oil, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fuel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(oil, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(oil, has quality good)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(natural gas, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(oil, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fuel, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fuel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(castor oil, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(castor oil, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(olive oil, is good choice)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(oil, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(fuel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(oil, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vegetable oil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(oil, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fuel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(oil, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fuel, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(oil, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(natural gas, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(oil, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(castor oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(castor oil, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(olive oil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(castor oil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(castor oil, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(olive oil, is good choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(olive oil, is good choice)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(olive oil, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(olive oil, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(oil, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(oil, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(oil, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(oil, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(oil, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oil, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(oil, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(oil, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(oil, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(olive oil, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(olive oil, is good choice)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(castor oil, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(castor oil, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(olive oil, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fuel, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(natural gas, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(oil, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fuel, be bad for environment)