oligopoly: be bad for consumers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.52
, competition
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.33
, firm
Weight: 0.28
, monopoly
Weight: 0.24
Siblings banking industry
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.33
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.30
, petroleum
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for consumers 1.00
be good for consumers 0.98
be dangerous to consumers 0.93
CAN can dangerous to consumers 0.87
be bad for economy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(competition, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(competition, be good for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(competition, be bad for consumers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(competition, be good for consumers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be good for consumers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be bad for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for consumers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(competition, be bad for consumers)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for consumers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(monopoly, be good for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(competition, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(competition, be good for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(oligopoly, be dangerous to consumers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(oligopoly, be good for consumers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(oligopoly, CAN can dangerous to consumers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be good for consumers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(oligopoly, be dangerous to consumers)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good for consumers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(competition, be good for consumers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(competition, be bad for consumers)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for consumers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good for consumers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(competition, be good for consumers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(competition, be bad for consumers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(oligopoly, be bad for consumers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for economy)