operating system: need security mechanisms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer program
Weight: 0.73
, operation
Weight: 0.73
, solution
Weight: 0.70
, function
Weight: 0.66
, free software
Weight: 0.66
Siblings system
Weight: 0.37
, central processing unit
Weight: 0.36
, nervous system
Weight: 0.35
, central nervous system
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
need security mechanisms 1.00
of protection to system 0.78
be called systems 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, of protection to system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(system, of protection to system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(system, of protection to system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(operating system, need security mechanisms)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(operating system, be called systems)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(operating system, of protection to system)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(operating system, be called systems)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(operating system, of protection to system)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(operating system, of protection to system)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(operating system, of protection to system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(operating system, need security mechanisms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(operating system, need security mechanisms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(operating system, need security mechanisms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(system, of protection to system)