operating system: of protection to system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer program
Weight: 0.73
, operation
Weight: 0.73
, solution
Weight: 0.70
, function
Weight: 0.66
, free software
Weight: 0.66
Siblings system
Weight: 0.37
, central processing unit
Weight: 0.36
, nervous system
Weight: 0.35
, central nervous system
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
of protection to system 1.00
of protection 0.95
need security mechanisms 0.78
be called systems 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(system, of protection to system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(system, of protection to system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(operating system, of protection to system)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(operating system, of protection)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(operating system, of protection)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(operating system, of protection)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(operating system, be called systems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(operating system, need security mechanisms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(operating system, of protection)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(operating system, be called systems)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(operating system, need security mechanisms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(operating system, need security mechanisms)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(operating system, be called systems)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(operating system, need security mechanisms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(operating system, be called systems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(operating system, of protection to system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(operating system, of protection to system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(operating system, of protection to system)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(system, of protection to system)