operation: be much better than rush

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.62
, functional group
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.73
, raid
Weight: 0.72
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, distribution
Weight: 0.66
, business activity
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much better than rush 1.00
be better than one 0.85
be better than first 0.84
has quality better 0.77
cost much more in america 0.76
be in than others 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(extraction, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(extraction, be better than one)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(extraction, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(extraction, be better than one)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(extraction, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(extraction, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(operation, be much better than rush)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(operation, cost much more in america)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(operation, cost much more in america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(operation, cost much more in america)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(operation, cost much more in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operation, be much better than rush)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be much better than rush)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(extraction, be better than one)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(operation, be much better than rush) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(extraction, has quality better)