owl: be on endangered list

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.76
, predator
Weight: 0.71
, creature
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.68
Siblings barn owl
Weight: 0.79
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.75
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.41
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.41
, falcon
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on endangered list 1.00
be on list 0.90
is endangered 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(owl, be on endangered list)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(great horned owl, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be on list)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, be on endangered list)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(falcon, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(snowy owl, is endangered)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(snowy owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be on endangered list)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(snowy owl, be on list)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(snowy owl, be on list)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(great horned owl, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(great horned owl, is endangered)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(falcon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(falcon, is endangered)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(owl, be on endangered list)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(owl, be on list)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(owl, be on list)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(owl, is endangered)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(owl, is endangered)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(owl, be on list)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(owl, be on endangered list)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(great horned owl, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be on list)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(falcon, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(snowy owl, be on endangered list)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(owl, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)