owner: be interested in activity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents partner
Weight: 0.67
, manager
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.65
, client
Weight: 0.63
Siblings proprietor
Weight: 0.63
, shareholder
Weight: 0.62
, breeder
Weight: 0.53
, cuban
Weight: 0.47
, mara
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be interested in activity 1.00
be interested in activity of business 0.97
be interested in business 0.87
be interested in statements 0.78
care about activities 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(manager, be interested in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(owner, be interested in activity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(manager, be interested in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(manager, be interested in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in statements)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(manager, be interested in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(owner, be interested in activity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(shareholder, be interested in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(shareholder, be interested in statements)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(owner, be interested in activity)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity of business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(owner, be interested in activity of business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(owner, be interested in activity of business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in statements)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(owner, be interested in activity of business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(owner, be interested in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(owner, be interested in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(owner, be interested in statements)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(owner, be interested in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(owner, be interested in statements)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(owner, be interested in statements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(owner, be interested in activity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manager, be interested in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(shareholder, be interested in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(shareholder, be interested in statements)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(owner, be interested in activity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manager, be interested in business)