owner: have influence on business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents partner
Weight: 0.67
, manager
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.65
, client
Weight: 0.63
Siblings proprietor
Weight: 0.63
, shareholder
Weight: 0.62
, breeder
Weight: 0.53
, cuban
Weight: 0.47
, mara
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have influence on business 1.00
have influence 0.93
use ethically social influence 0.79
want business 0.79
use ethically influence 0.78
be interested in activity of business 0.76
be interested in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(owner, have influence on business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(manager, be interested in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(manager, be interested in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(manager, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(owner, have influence on business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(shareholder, be interested in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(owner, have influence on business)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(owner, have influence)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(owner, have influence)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(owner, want business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(owner, be interested in activity of business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(owner, have influence)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(owner, have influence on business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(owner, have influence on business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manager, be interested in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(shareholder, be interested in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(owner, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(manager, be interested in business)