owner: name pet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manager
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.65
, client
Weight: 0.63
, contractor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shareholder
Weight: 0.62
, breeder
Weight: 0.53
, cuban
Weight: 0.47
, family member
Weight: 0.35
, supervisor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
name pet 1.00
let pet in 0.85
train their pet 0.82
show dog 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(breeder, show dog)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(breeder, show dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(breeder, show dog)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(owner, name pet)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(owner, let pet in)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owner, let pet in)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(owner, let pet in)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(owner, train their pet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(owner, train their pet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(owner, let pet in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(owner, train their pet)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(owner, train their pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(owner, name pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(owner, name pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(owner, name pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(breeder, show dog)