owner: train their pet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manager
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.65
, client
Weight: 0.63
, contractor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shareholder
Weight: 0.62
, breeder
Weight: 0.53
, cuban
Weight: 0.47
, family member
Weight: 0.35
, supervisor
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
train their pet 1.00
let pet in 0.87
name pet 0.82
show dog 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(breeder, show dog)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(breeder, show dog) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(breeder, show dog)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(owner, train their pet)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(owner, let pet in)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(owner, let pet in)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(owner, name pet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(owner, name pet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(owner, let pet in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(owner, name pet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(owner, let pet in)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(owner, name pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(owner, train their pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(owner, train their pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(owner, train their pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(breeder, show dog)