palm: is hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.60
, pda
Weight: 0.58
, body part
Weight: 0.57
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.57
Siblings computer keyboard
Weight: 0.34
, stylus
Weight: 0.34
, electronic device
Weight: 0.33
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.33
, network device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hot 1.00
get hot 0.96
become hot 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(palm, is hot)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(palm, is hot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, get hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, get hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(device, get hot)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, get hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, get hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(mobile phone, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(palm, is hot)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(palm, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(electronic device, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(electronic device, get hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(palm, is hot)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(palm, get hot)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(palm, get hot)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(palm, become hot)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(palm, get hot)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(palm, become hot)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(palm, become hot)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(palm, get hot)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(palm, become hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(palm, is hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(palm, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(device, get hot)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(electronic device, get hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(device, get hot)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(palm, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, get hot)