pan: is made of aluminium

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.65
, parameter
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, tool
Weight: 0.56
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.80
, wok
Weight: 0.56
, skillet
Weight: 0.53
, baking sheet
Weight: 0.49
, saucepan
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
is made of aluminium 1.00
is made 1.00
be made 0.98
be made of aluminium 0.98
is made for 0.97
have have made 0.89
be important making 0.85
be made from materials 0.77
be made with handles 0.76
handles have made 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cooking utensil, be made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tool, be important making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tool, is made for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tool, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cooking utensil, handles have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pan, is made of aluminium)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(tool, is made)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(tool, be made)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tool, is made for)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, handles have made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tool, be important making)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tool, be made)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made for)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tool, is made)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tool, be important making)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, have have made)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, handles have made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be made of aluminium)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, be made with handles)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(cooking utensil, be made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tool, is made for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(cooking utensil, have have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tool, be important making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(tool, is made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(tool, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(cooking utensil, handles have made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(saucepan, be made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(saucepan, be made of aluminium)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(saucepan, be made with handles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(saucepan, be made with handles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pan, is made of aluminium)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pan, is made)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pan, is made)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pan, is made)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pan, be made from materials)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pan, be made from materials)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pan, be made from materials)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pan, be made from materials)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pan, is made of aluminium)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tool, is made)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tool, be made)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tool, is made for)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, handles have made)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tool, be important making)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(saucepan, be made of aluminium)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(saucepan, be made with handles)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(tool, is made)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tool, be made)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(tool, is made for)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, be made of aluminium)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, have have made)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, handles have made)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pan, is made of aluminium) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tool, be important making)