panama: was chose as sight

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.63
, south america
Weight: 0.62
, central american country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.58
, central america
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, north america
Weight: 0.35
, puerto rico
Weight: 0.35
, south africa
Weight: 0.35
, mexico
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was chose as sight 1.00
was chose as sight for canal 0.90
was selected as place 0.77
was chosen as site 0.77
was first choice build 0.75
was chosen for site 0.75
was good choice building 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(panama, was chose as sight)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(panama, was first choice build)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(panama, was selected as place)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(panama, was good choice building)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(panama, was first choice build)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(panama, was first choice build)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(panama, was good choice building)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(panama, was good choice building)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(panama, was selected as place)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(panama, was chose as sight for canal)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(panama, was selected as place)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen for site)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(panama, was selected as place)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(panama, was good choice building)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen for site)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(panama, was first choice build)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen for site)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chose as sight)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(panama, was chose as sight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(panama, was chose as sight)