panama: was selected as place

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.63
, south america
Weight: 0.62
, central american country
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.58
, central america
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mexico city
Weight: 0.35
, north america
Weight: 0.35
, puerto rico
Weight: 0.35
, south africa
Weight: 0.35
, mexico
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was selected as place 1.00
was chosen as site 0.84
was chosen for site 0.83
was selected as place for panama canal 0.80
was first choice build 0.78
was chose as sight 0.77
was chosen as site for canal joining 0.76
was good choice building 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(panama, was selected as place)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(panama, was first choice build)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(panama, was first choice build)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen for site)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(panama, was chose as sight)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(panama, was chose as sight)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(panama, was chose as sight)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(panama, was good choice building)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(panama, was good choice building)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panama, was chose as sight)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(panama, was first choice build)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen for site)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(panama, was good choice building)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen for site)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(panama, was good choice building)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(panama, was first choice build)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(panama, was selected as place)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(panama, was selected as place)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(panama, was selected as place)