panama: was chosen for site

Property	Similarity
was chosen for site	1.00
was chosen as site	0.99
was chosen for site for canal	0.89
was chosen as site for canal	0.89
was chosen as site for canal joining	0.86
was selected as place	0.83
was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific	0.82
was good choice building	0.77
was selected as place for panama canal	0.77
is location	0.76

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(panama, was chosen for site for canal)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(panama, was selected as place)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site for canal)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(panama, is location)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen for site for canal)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(panama, was chosen for site for canal)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(panama, is location)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(panama, was selected as place)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(panama, is location)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(panama, was selected as place)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(panama, was good choice building)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.93

Salient(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(panama, was good choice building)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(panama, was chosen as site for canal joining to pacific)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(panama, was good choice building)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(panama, was selected as place)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(panama, was good choice building)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(panama, was selected as place for panama canal)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(panama, was chosen for site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(panama, is location)

Parents	latin america Weight: 0.63 , south america Weight: 0.62 , central american country Weight: 0.62 , place Weight: 0.58 , central america Weight: 0.58
Siblings	mexico city Weight: 0.35 , north america Weight: 0.35 , puerto rico Weight: 0.35 , south africa Weight: 0.35 , mexico Weight: 0.34

panama: was chosen for site

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible