panel: is best

Related concepts

Parents	board Weight: 0.64 , issue Weight: 0.61 , project Weight: 0.59 , application Weight: 0.58
Siblings	eminent domain Weight: 0.32 , court case Weight: 0.31 , hearing aid Weight: 0.31 , topic Weight: 0.31 , moderator Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is best	1.00
be best suited for use	0.83
is perfect	0.77
has quality good	0.76
is best discussed	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(board, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(panel, is best)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(panel, is best)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(application, be best suited for use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(panel, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(application, be best suited for use)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(board, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(board, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(application, be best suited for use)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(topic, is best discussed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(application, be best suited for use) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(panel, is best)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(board, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(panel, is best)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(project, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(panel, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(topic, is best discussed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(topic, is best discussed)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(eminent domain, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(eminent domain, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(panel, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(panel, is perfect)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(panel, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(panel, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(panel, is perfect)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(panel, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(panel, is perfect)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(panel, is perfect)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(panel, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(panel, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(panel, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(application, be best suited for use)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(project, has quality good)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(board, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(topic, is best discussed)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(eminent domain, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(application, be best suited for use)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(project, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(panel, is best) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(board, has quality good)