paper menu: be at cheap restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cheap restaurant 1.00
be used to inexpensive restaurant 0.91
be used to restaurant 0.85
be find at restaurant 0.84
be find in some restaurant 0.82
be at chinese restaurant 0.80
be at diner 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(paper menu, be used to inexpensive restaurant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be used to inexpensive restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(paper menu, be at diner)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be at diner)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be at diner)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be used to inexpensive restaurant)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(paper menu, be at diner)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(paper menu, be used to inexpensive restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)