paper menu: be at chinese restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at chinese restaurant 1.00
be used to restaurant 0.82
be find at restaurant 0.80
be at cheap restaurant 0.80
be find in some restaurant 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)